Is the vaccine causing harm

Is antibody dependent enhancement occurring.

One of the main criticisms that those critical of the Pfizer vaccine have voiced is that there is no long term safety data to justify the public rollout of the vaccine.

But we were assured by our government that it was no cause for concern and that any issues of safety would be monitored.

We have now reached a stage in 2022 however where we are seeing very significant signs of possible  long term vaccine harm in our hospitalisation data but this is being ignored and is quietly being swept under the carpet.

If the public don’t jump up and down about this it will never get addressed.

Our media and politicians have done a pretty good job at explaining away the alarming data coming from our hospitals but you need to remember that these were the very people and organisations that have been telling us the vaccine is safe and effective for quite some time now.

Were it to be discovered the vaccine is actually causing a lot of harm to the public then these same politicians and media would certainly have a lot of questions to answer.

Many who are vaccinated may also find this information hard to accept simply due to their faith that the government wouldn’t get things wrong on something as important as this.

The hospitalisation data I’m talking about is the alarming percentage of hospitalisations of the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.

We’ve been told it is simply because more people are vaccinated than unvaccinated but this doesn’t stack up.

Recently, a publication called “The Expose” published an article entitled

“Official NZ Ministry of Health Data suggests the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; & the M.o.H is trying to hide it”

You can read it

here

In this article they apply the Pfizer vaccine efficacy formula to the New Zealand ministry of health covid hospitalisation data for earlier this year.

The results show that the Pfizer vaccine has negative efficacy of -280%. A far cry from the +94% efficacy we were quoted.

Their article has caused quite a stir.

In vaccine trials, a simple efficacy formula is used to calculate how well the vaccine protects you from covid.

Which is how they came up with the figure of 94% efficacy.

With the vaccine rollout in New Zealand being no different to a trial, getting a result of -280% efficacy from our hospital data certainly warrants further investigation.

If it was a case of the vaccine just not working then the governments prior reasoning that the high hospitalisation rates of the vaccinated are just a result of high vaccination would make sense.

But if that was the case then applying the efficacy formula to our hospitalisation data should surely show a result of 0% efficacy shouldnt it, meaning the vaccine hasn’t worked in those vaccinated people (presuming the formula isn’t just a scam to sell a worthless concoction of chemicals).

I suppose we could say that the efficacy formula is faulty or not fit for purpose but to take that position means we must also toss out the 94% efficacy claim from the Pfizer trials.

But regardless, such a high negative efficacy must give cause for further investigation into the vaccines safety.

A wider investigation which doesn’t just rely on an efficacy formula is needed.

Vaccines are full of antigens like PEG as one simple example.

To assume that injecting chemicals into your body can’t ever cause any negative effect in some people is unrealistic.

Either this data is evidence of long term vaccine harm or the vaccine and the whole system that verifies a vaccines safety and efficacy is a scam, always has been a scam and the vaccine doesn’t work.

The efficacy formula either works or it doesn’t. The vaccine either works or it doesn’t. Either way, we are not getting much honesty from our government.

These people may have had an adverse event to the vaccine and it should be investigated as an adverse event. The occurrence of antibody dependent enhancement is certainly being bandied about in some scientific circles and many vaccinated are reporting a new illness with a very scratchy throat which they can’t seem to shake.

This is an example of the kind of thing that should be investigated as possible long term vaccine side effects. It should not be ignored by our government but unfortunately it will be ignored by our government because of the vaccine supply contract they signed forcing them to finance a legal defence for Pfizer should any legal claims be made against them.

What this data should definitely show you is that it’s time to take responsibility for our own health back from the government because very obviously things are not adding up.