Is artificial intelligence like chatgpt, a Trojan horse designed to deceive the public
Calling AI programmes intelligent is blatantly incorrect.
Intelligence isn’t what we know, but how we go about knowing. The big flaw is that AI cannot discern truth from lies, or put another way, fact from propaganda. In humans, there’s high bandwidth intelligence, and low bandwidth intelligence, and we measure the bandwidth of a persons intelligence with an IQ test.
Proper IQ tests, are designed to see how broad people think, when confronted with a problem to solve. Intelligent people look at things from every angle possible. They put questions to themselves, without bias from their currently held beliefs, their thinking is a very broad approach, hence why I’ve termed a high IQ, as high bandwidth thinking. On the other side we have low bandwidth thinking which results in lower IQ scores
Knowledge is not intelligence but a product of it. Whether that knowledge is correct, may be looked upon as intelligence, when in actual fact, it’s just memorised knowledge. Reading textbooks does not make one intelligent, it makes them knowledgeable in a certain topic, there’s a difference.
In essence, artificial intelligence can be manipulated very easily by those in power, by feeding it wrong information, propaganda for example, or by limiting where it searches for answers. AI can’t even tell if it’s giving a correct answer or not, it all depends what information it is fed. Similar to the useful idiot politicians when fed the safe and effective narrative.
To me, it looks like one of the most powerful propaganda tools in existence and another way of dividing the public to get them fighting amongst themselves.
AI will not make you smart, it will make you less smart. Farming out your own thinking to an AI program, is no different to farming out your own thinking to state run media.
If people are too lazy to do their own critical thinking and fact checking, then I doubt they will fact check what AI tells them either. This is a recipe for disaster.
The movie Idiocracy comes to mind, in fact I suspect we’ve already arrived at that future.
Fact checking is a reasonably new thing. Western governments only started doing it when they saw the reality they had built with their propaganda, was starting to crumble. The public were waking up to the correct reality, and this was a threat to the governments credibility and authority.
After talking of how dangerous AI could become, they then make it freely accessible to the public. Some students at university, then proceeded to get AI to write all their essays. I smell a rat!
Would governments really want us to be able to simply ask AI what the truth is about something? Or is it a Trojan horse, to get the public to accept the state approved reality, by manipulating them through AI programmes and their control over them.
AI can only make the human race less intelligent and less knowledgeable. The public putting all their trust in the answers of AI will allow the elites to create a new false reality that benefits them and harms the public.
I refuse to use AI, but if I did, the first question I’d ask, is whether the Pfizer genetically modified modRNA injection is a vaccine, and whether it’s safe and effective.
I’m sure the answer would be interesting to say the least.
If something is artificial, it means it’s not reality, but a divergence of reality
You can make AI your friend by fooling AI. Someone has make AI all the correct answer wrt to 911 type destruction (no itsnot termite plane or nuclear), and about bogus moon landing. See writing by “911 revisionist” on substack.
NYT ‘fact check’ on RFK’s criticism of Fruit Loops is case in point, yeah?